Simplification of Law Regulations in Copyright Criminal Act Settlement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i2.9Abstract
The existence of overlapping laws and regulations in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) sector creates conflicts in their implementation. For example, the obligation to mediate as a condition for carrying out criminal charges for copyright infringement is based on Article 95 paragraph (4) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Mediation provisions in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration are a way of settling civil disputes outside the court to settle by deliberation and consensus with the help of a mediator. Meanwhile, mediation based on Perma Number 1 of 2008 is intended as an obligation for judges at the first level court in the District Court and Religious Courts in the context of resolving civil disputes. Settlement of copyright disputes is the authority of the Commercial Court, as a special court within the general court environment. However, the Commercial Court does not apply the obligation of mediation. The study results indicate that the simplification of legislation in the intellectual property sector will result in quality, simple, orderly legislation that will also increase investment, create employment opportunities, reduce the burden on society and the efficiency of the state budget.
Keywords: Simplification; Copyright; Criminal Act Settlement
References
Agustina Soebachman, 2014, Sejarah Nusantara Berdasarkan Urutan Tahun, Surya Media Utama, Yogyakarta, 2014.
Iswantoro, ‘Strategy and Management of Dispute Resolution , Land Conflicts at the Land Office of Sleman Regency’, 1.1 (2021), 1–17
Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Resti Dian Luthviati, Civil Registration, Study Program, and Universitas Sebelas Maret, ‘The Crime Of Damage After the Constitutional Court ’ s Decision Number 76 / PUU-XV / 2017’, 1.1 (2021), 31–41
Ma’ruf, Arifin, ‘Legal Aspects of Environment in Indonesia : An Efforts to Prevent Environmental Damage and Pollution’, 1.1 (2021), 18–30
Res, Redi, ‘Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability Juridical Overview of Mortgage’, 1.1 (2021), 42–53
Syahlan, ‘Effective and Efficient Synchronization in Harmonization of Regulations Indonesia’, 1.1 (2021), 54–70
Aline Gratika Nugrahani, “Hal-Hal Aktual Pada Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014â€, Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, 12 Juni 2015.
Basuki Antariksa, “Landasan Filosofis dan Sejarah Perkembangan Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Relevansinya Bagi Kepentingan Pembangunan di Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia, Vol. 11, No.1, Juni 2016.
Dan M. Kahan, “Sosial Influence, Sosial Meaning, and Deterrenceâ€, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 83, Tahun 1997.
David D. Friedman, “Should the Characteristics of Victims and Criminals Count? Payne v Tennessee and Two Views of Efficient Punishmentâ€, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 34 Tahun 1993.
Henry Donald Lbn. Toruan, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Acara Cepatâ€, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol.17, No. 1 Maret 2017.
Herbert Hovenkamp,â€Rationality in law and Economicsâ€, George Washington Law Review, Vol. 60, Tahun 1992.
Keith N. Hylton, “Punitive Damages and the Economics Theory of Penaltiesâ€, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 87, Tahun 1998.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia, 2019, Laporan Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018, Sekretaris Jenderal KKP RI, Jakarta.
Lewis A. Kornhauser, “On Justifying Cost and Benefit Analysisâ€, Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 29 Tahun 2000.
Mahrus Ali, “Penegakan Hukum Pidana yang Optima (Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi atas Hukumâ€, Jurnal Hukum, Volume 15, Nomor 2, April 2008.
Mark A. Cohen, “The Economics of Crime and Punishment: Implications for Sentencing of Economic Crime and New Technology Offencesâ€, George Mason Law Review, Vol. 9 Tahun 2000.
Nevey Varida Ariani, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pengadilan†Jurnal Rechtsvinding. Vol 1, No. 2, Agustus 2012.
Nuno Garoupa dan Daniel Klerman, “Optimal Law Enforcement with A Rent Seeking Governmentâ€, American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 4, Tahun 2000.
Padrisan Jamba, “Analisis Penerapan Delik Aduan Dalam UU Hak Cipta Untuk Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Hak Cipta Di Indonesiaâ€, Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, Vol.3, No.1, 2016.
Peter K.Yu, “Intellectual Property, Asian Philosophy and the Yin-Yang Schoolâ€, The WIPO Journal, Volume 7,Issue 1,Tahun 2015.
Prasetyo Hadi Purwandoko dan M. Najib Imanullah, “Application of Natural Law Theory (Natural Right) to Protect the Intellectual Property Rightsâ€, Yustisia, Vol. 6 No. 1 January – April 2017.
Rian Saputra, Adi Sulistiyono dan Emmy Latifah, “Pendaftaran Internasional Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Indonesia Dalam Perdagangan Global (Study Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2018)â€, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Volume VII, Nomor 2, Agustus 2019.
Richard A. Posner, “Rational Choice, Behavioral Economics and The Lawâ€, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 50 Tahun 1998.
Richard Posner, 1998, Economics Analysis of Law, Edisi Kelima, Aspen Law & Business, New York.
Robert Cooter dan Thomas Ullen, 2000, Law and Economics, Cetk Ketiga, Eddison Wesley Longman Inc Amerika Serikat.
Robert Cooter, “Prices and Sanctiosâ€, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 84, Tahun 1984.
Russel B. Korobkin dan Thomas S. Ulen, “Law and Behavioral Science: Removing The Rationality Assumption from Law to Economicsâ€, California Law Review, Vol. 88 Tahun 2000.
Sufiarina, “Pergeseran Tindak Pidana Hak Cipta Ke Arah Sengketa Perdata (Tinjauan atas Pasal 95 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta)â€, Jurnal Cita Hukum, Vol.5, No. 1 Juni 2017.
Suyud Margono, “Prinsip Deklaratif Pendaftaran Hak Cipta: Kontradiksi Kaedah PendaÅŒ aran Ciptaan dengan Asas Kepemilikan Publikasi Pertama Kaliâ€, Jurnal Rechtsvinding. Vol 1, No. 2, Agustus 2012.
Thomas J. Miles, “Empirical Economics and Study of Punishment and Crimeâ€, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 237 Tahun 2005.
Thomas Miles, “Empirical Economics and Study of Punishment and Crime†Legal Reivew University of Chicago, Vol. 237, Tahun 2005.
Trias Palupi Kurnianingrum, “Materi Baru Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta†Negara Hukum Volume 6 Nomor 1, Edisi Juni 2015.
Wicipto Setiadi, “Simplifikasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Rangka Mendukung Kemudahan Berusahaâ€, Jurnal Rechtsvinding. Vol 7, No. 3, Desember 2018.
William L. Barnes Jr, “Revenge on Utilitarianism: Renouncing A Comprehensive Economics Theory of Crime and Punishmentâ€, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 74, Tahun 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
