Suci Wijayanti (1), Suparji Suparji (2), Pujiyono Suwadi (3)
The peace fine mechanism has increasingly been applied as an alternative to formal judicial proceedings in resolving economic crimes in Indonesia. However, its growing use reveals significant juridical and conceptual problems, particularly the lack of an integrated legal framework and the fragmentation of regulation across sectoral laws. These conditions generate legal uncertainty and raise concerns regarding accountability and the potential abuse of discretionary power by law enforcement authorities. This study aims to examine the normative foundation, scope, and limitations of the peace fine mechanism by focusing on the boundaries of prosecutorial authority and the implications for the principle of legality. To achieve this objective, the research applies a normative legal method with a doctrinal approach, systematically analyzing statutory instruments, including the Economic Crime Law, the Prosecutor’s Law, the Anti-Corruption Law, and relevant sectoral regulations. This study produces three principal findings. First, existing sectoral legislation implicitly recognizes non-judicial settlement mechanisms; however, the Indonesian legal system does not provide a comprehensive regulatory framework that clearly delineates the criteria, procedures, and legal consequences of the peace fine mechanism. Second, the absence of such regulation generates legal uncertainty and enables large corporations to circumvent criminal liability. Third, based on these findings, the study affirms the urgent necessity for the State to formulate and enact a comprehensive Economic Criminal Law to guarantee legal certainty, accountability, and coherence in the application of both judicial and non-judicial settlement mechanisms for economic crimes
Abdillah, Junaidi, and Nurul Huda, ‘Dari Divine Law Hingga Man-Made Law; Transformasi Pidana Islam Dalam KUHP Baru Aspek Sanksi Pidana’, Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 7.1 (2024), 1–26 https://doi.org/10.32665/ALMAQASHIDI.V7I1.3006
Abiyoga, Daffa, Ivan Taffarel, and Donny Arjun, ‘Studi Pemetaan Hukum Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Di Indonesia’, COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916), 1.1 (2021), 1–12 https://doi.org/10.69957/CR.V1I1.15
Aditya, Zaka Firma, ‘Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Serta Pengaturannya Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia ’, Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8.1 (2019), 37 https://doi.org/10.33331/RECHTSVINDING.V8I1.305
Afrillo, Henry, and Hudi Yusuf, ‘Analisis Peran Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Melalui Evaluasi Regulasi Dan Praktik’, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 , 2.2 (2025), 799–804 https://doi.org/10.62379/PWZ1X297
Ahwan, and Nunung Rahmania, ‘Upaya Paksa Dalam Ruu Kuhap: Perspektif Model Sistem Peradilan Pidana’, Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 10.2 (2025), 375–92 https://doi.org/10.29303/JKH.V10I2.274
Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah, ‘The Urgency of Law Reforms on Economic Crimes in Indonesia’, Cogent Social Sciences, 9.1 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2175487;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:OASS20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Alaydrus, Hussein, ‘Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Sebagai Alternatif Penegakan Hukum Pada Tindak Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia’, Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3.5 (2025), 8036–50 https://doi.org/10.61104/ALZ.V3I5.2472
Alhakim, Abdurrakhman, and Eko Soponyono, ‘Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1.3 (2019), 322–36 https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V1I3.322-336
Andini, Orin Gusta, Nilasari, and Andreas Avelino Eurian, ‘Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: A Utopia’, Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31.1 (2023), 72–90 https://doi.org/10.22219/LJIH.V31I1.24247
Anggreani, Siti Mujiana, Muhammad Mashuri, and Wiwin Ariesta, ‘Asas Oportunitas Pada Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Umum’, Yurijaya : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7.1 (2025), 70–86 https://doi.org/10.51213/YURIJAYA.V7I1.150
Anindita, Faizah, and Trubus Rahardiansyah, ‘Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Dampak Ekonomi Dan Lingkungan Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Kasus Harvey Moeis’, Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3.3 (2025), 1345–52 https://doi.org/10.61104/ALZ.V3I3.1365
Apriadi, Mutia Aulia, Naurah Edsa Nakiyah, Miriam Mahalia, and Asep Suherman, ‘Peranan Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Dalam Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis’, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 3.1 (2025), 73–80 https://doi.org/10.62379/GV7ND577
Arafat, Muhammad, ‘Paradigma Pemidanaan Baru Dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif Sanksi Dan Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , 2.1 (2025), 33–46 https://doi.org/10.58540/JIH.V2I1.1047
Aulia, Aulia, Muhammad Nur, and Sulaiman Sulaiman, ‘Penghentian Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Terhadap Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara’, Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 13.1 (2025), 41–66 https://doi.org/10.29103/SJP.V13I1.19122
Azharie, Ade, ‘Pemanfaatan Hukum Sebagai Sarana Untuk Mencapai Keadilan Sosial’, Lex Aeterna Law Journal, 1.2 (2023), 72–90 https://doi.org/10.69780/LEXAETERNALAWJOURNAL.V1I2.20
Badaru, Baharuddin, ‘Kepentingan Umum Dalam Asas Oportunitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana’, AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5.2 (2023), 1737–54 https://doi.org/10.37680/ALMANHAJ.V5I2.3715
Badaru, Baharuddin, and Corresponding Author, ‘Kepentingan Umum Dalam Asas Oportunitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana’, AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5.2 (2023), 1737–54 https://doi.org/10.37680/ALMANHAJ.V5I2.3715
Bakhri, Syaiful, Jl K H Ahmad, and Dahlan Jakarta, ‘Kebijakan Legislatif Tentang Pidana Denda Dan Penerapannya Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Korupsi’, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 17.2 (2010), 317–34 https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL17.ISS2.ART8
Beale, Sara Sun, ‘Prosecutorial Discretion in Three Systems: Balancing Conflicting Goals and Providing Mechanisms for Control’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014 https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2433732
Bohmert, Miriam Northcutt, Grant Duwe, and Natalie Kroovand Hipple, ‘Evaluating Restorative Justice Circles of Support and Accountability: Can Social Support Overcome Structural Barriers?’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62.3 (2018), 739–58 https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16652627
Boudreaux, Christopher J., Boris N. Nikolaev, and Randall G. Holcombe, ‘Corruption and Destructive Entrepreneurship’, Small Business Economics, 51.1 (2018), 181–202 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-017-9927-X
Braithwaite, John, ‘Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts’, Crime and Justice, 25 (1999), 1–127 https://doi.org/10.1086/449287
Chan, Muhammad Rafly, Ragil Surya Prakasa, Muhammad Ibrahim Musa, Harits Surya Pratama, Muhammad Hafisz Al-Qalil, and Dwi Ari Suwanda, ‘Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Ekonomi’, PUAN INDONESIA, 5.2 (2024), 693–700 https://doi.org/10.37296/JPI.V5I2.306
Dharmasetya, Lani, ‘Upaya Ultimum Remedium Sebagai Upaya Kepastian Hukum Pidana Pajak’, POSTULAT, 1.1 (2023), 128–30 https://doi.org/10.37010/POSTULAT.V1I1.1646
Emirsya, Melfa, Joelman Subaidi, and Ferdy Saputra, ‘Penerapan Asas Dominus Litis Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8.3 (2025) https://doi.org/10.29103/JIMFH.V8I3.22997
Fajri, Fathur Rohman, R. Ardini Rakhmania Ardan, and Haris Djoko Saputro, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Sanksi Pidana Bagi Gelandangan Dan Pengemis’, Rechtswetenschap : Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, 2.2 (2025) https://doi.org/10.36859/RECHTSWETENSCHAP.V2I2.4083
Fariduddin, Ahmad Mukhlish, and Nicolaus Yudistira Dwi Tetono, ‘Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Bagi Koruptor Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Utilitarianisme’, Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8.1 (2022), 1–12 https://doi.org/10.32697/INTEGRITAS.V8I1.903
Gavrielides, Theo, and Vasso Artinopoulou, ‘Restorative Justice and Violence Against Women: Comparing Greece and The United Kingdom’, Asian Journal of Criminology, 8.1 (2013), 25–40 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11417-011-9123-X
Ginting, Risnawati Br, Ediwarman Ediwarman, Edi Yunara, and Marlina Marlina, ‘Penghentian Penuntutan Melalui Penerapan Restorative Justice Di Tingkat Kejaksaan’, Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2 (2023), 789–806 https://doi.org/10.56128/LJOALR.V2I10.233
Graycar, Adam, ‘Corruption and Public Administration’, Handbook on Corruption, Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration, 2020, 1–8 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900910.00006
Gusta Andini, Orin, Fitrah Marinda, and Khulaifi Hamdani, ‘Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Aparatur Sipil Negara’, Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 9.1 (2022), 56–67 https://doi.org/10.24252/AL-QADAU.V9I1.29188
Herawati, Ellyana, Hadi Mustopa, Metty Sander, and Jecika Fujianti, ‘Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Luar Biasa Di Bidang Ekonomi’, Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 5.7 (2025), 2819–31 https://doi.org/10.59188/JURNALSOSTECH.V5I7.32225
Hobson, Jonathan, Anamika Twyman-Ghoshal, Rebecca Banwell-Moore, and Daniel P. Ash, ‘Restorative Justice, Youth Violence, and Policing: A Review of the Evidence’, Laws, 11.4 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/LAWS11040062
Hoyle, Carolyn, and Fernanda Fonseca Rosenblatt, ‘Looking Back to the Future: Threats to the Success of Restorative Justice in the United Kingdom’, Victims and Offenders, 11.1 (2016), 30–49 https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1095830
Husin, Vanya Quinta, Fristia Berdian Tamza, Dan Ahmad, and Irzal Fardiansyah, ‘Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Studi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6.7 (2025) https://doi.org/10.56370/JHLG.V6I7.1986
Kaban, Kevin Sulistyo, and Abdul Kholiq, ‘Optimalisasi Regulasi Pidana Terkait Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Ekonomi Berlandaskan Perspektif Hukum Progresif Berkeadilan’, Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 4.5 (2025), 1811–23 https://doi.org/10.58344/LOCUS.V4I5.4119
Kasuri, Muhammad Ramzan, Ata Ullah Khan Mahmood, and Sheer Abbas, ‘Globalization of Prosecutorial Justice: An Appraisal’, Global Political Review, VI.II (2021), 67–78 https://doi.org/10.31703/GPR.2021(VI-II).08
Kewenangan, Manifestasi, Kejaksaan Dalam, Penerapan Denda, Damai Dalam, Tindak Pidana, Ekonomi Guna, and others, ‘Manifestasi Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penerapan Peace fine Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Guna Mengubah Tatanan Sosial Masyaraka’, The Prosecutor Law Review, 1.2 (2023), 20–35 https://doi.org/10.64843/PROLEV.V1I2.11
———, ‘Manifestasi Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penerapan Peace fine Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Guna Mengubah Tatanan Sosial Masyaraka’, The Prosecutor Law Review, 1.2 (2023), 20–35 https://doi.org/10.64843/PROLEV.V1I2.11
Khan, Anupriya, Satish Krishnan, and Amandeep Dhir, ‘Electronic Government and Corruption: Systematic Literature Review, Framework, and Agenda for Future Research’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120737
Knol, Maarten, ‘Toezicht Op de OM-Strafbeschikking’, 2025 https://doi.org/10.33612/DISS.1430829607
Komang Surya Mahesa, Pande, and Ayu Putu Laksmi Danyathi, ‘Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Teoritis Dan Praktis’, Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3.9 (2025), 3031–5220 https://doi.org/10.62281/AX2D1F19
Korompot, Moh Iqra Syabani, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and David Pradhan, ‘The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Indonesian Corruption Case: Is It Relevant?’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1.3 (2021), 135–46 https://doi.org/10.53955/JHCLS.V1I3.13
Laka, Iskandar, ‘Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Sebagai Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia’, Justice Pro: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4.2 (2020), 108–20 https://doi.org/10.53027/JP.V4I2.228
Latifah, Marfuatul, ‘Legalitas Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Legal Authoriy Of Prosecutor In The Investigation Of Corruption)’, Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 3.1 (2016), 97–114 https://doi.org/10.22212/JNH.V3I1.226
Lubis, Muhammad Kenan, Gunarto Gunarto, and Anis Mashdurohatun, ‘Legal Reconstruction of the Authority of Deponering Implementation by the Prosecution Office Based on Justice Value’, Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6.03 (2023), 171–76 https://doi.org/10.36348/SIJLCJ.2023.V06I03.006
Luna, Erik G., ‘The Models of Criminal Procedure’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 2.2 (1999), 389–535 https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.1999.2.2.389
Maglione, Giuseppe, ‘Restorative Justice, Crime Victims and Penal Welfarism. Mapping and Contextualising Restorative Justice Policy in Scotland’, Social and Legal Studies, 30.5 (2021), 745–67 https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920965669
Mardiansyah, Yogi, Harmaini Harmaini, and Ruwaiza Sasmita, ‘Lahirnya Mediasi Penal Dilihat Dari KUHP Lama Dan KUHP Baru’, Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2.1 (2024), 23–38 https://doi.org/10.70308/ADAGIUM.V2I1.25
Marlina, Andi, Donny Eddy Sam Karauwan, Achmad Juanedy, Anugrah Ramadhani, and Kata Kunci, ‘The Urgency of Reformulating the Handling of Petty Corruption through a Peaceful Fine Scheme in Indonesia’, Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 11.1 (2025), 62–76 https://doi.org/10.15642/AJ.2025.11.1.62-76
Marlina, Siti, Pauziah, Tessya Yunita Siregar, Indra Gusman, Yusrizal Amri, Erha Adhityantito Nugraha, and others, ‘Pengembangan Sistematika Hukum Pidana Dalam Kuhp Baru:Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Islam’, Jurnal Inovasi Hukum, 6.1 (2025), 23–38 https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jih/article/view/902
Maulana Abdul Azis Lubis, Chuk Vernom Manalu, Syawal Amry Siregar, and Muhammad Yasid, ‘Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ekonomi’, DIKTUM, 2.1 (2023), 155–63 https://doi.org/10.46930/DIKTUM.V2I1.3845
Migano, Sugiatno, Syamsul Bachri, Musakkir, and Amir Ilyas, ‘Prosecutor’s Office Intelligence Actions in Solving Corruption Crimes Through Types of Intelligence Difference’, Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12.1 (2024), e2899 https://doi.org/10.55908/SDGS.V12I1.2899
Mitchell, Matthew, ‘Analyzing the Law Qualitatively’, Qualitative Research Journal, 23.1 (2022), 102–13 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2022-0061
Moha, Sri Wahyuni S., Arif Mahfudin Ibrahim, Sri Olawati Suaib, and Melki T. Tunggati, ‘Relevansi Sanksi Pidana Dan Denda Administratif Dalam Penindakan Tax Evasion Di Indonesia’, Judge : Jurnal Hukum , 6.01 (2025), 202–17 https://doi.org/10.54209/JUDGE.V6I01.1199
Muhammad, Hasan, Muhammad Nurman, and Yudhistira Nugroho, ‘Kepastian Hukum Deponering Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan’, Jurnal Ilmiah AKSES, 3.2 (2025) https://doi.org/10.36841/AKSES.V3I2.7131
Nakzim Khalid Siddiq, and Lalu Panca Tresna D, ‘Peace fine : Hukuman Tanpa Pembuktian | Peace Fines: Punishment Without Proof’, Journal Of Community Engagement, 6.2 (2025) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.20251130
Nasution, Hani Riadho, and Abd. Harris, ‘Kedudukan Konsumen Dalam Hubungan Hukum Dengan Pelaku Usaha Di Indonesia’, Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 4.6 (2025), 470–84 https://doi.org/10.56128/LJOALR.V4I6.572
Nĕmec, Daniel, Eva Kotlánová, Igor Kotlán, and Zuzana Machová, ‘Corruption, Taxation and the Impact on the Shadow Economy’, Economies, 9.1 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ECONOMIES9010018
Pangaribuan, Aristo Marisi Adiputra, ‘Metode Wawancara Dalam Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal Dan Sosio-Legal’, Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 6.2 (2023), 351–83 https://doi.org/10.22437/UJH.6.2.351-383
Pratama, Diaz Jorge, Nuraliah Ali, and Satriya Nugraha, ‘Studi Tentang Implikasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Ekonomi’, MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11.1 (2025), 158–71 https://doi.org/10.52947/MORALITY.V11I1.937
Puri Kelod, Dauh, and Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, ‘Prospek Deferred Prosecution Agreement Untuk Preferensi Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Mengingat Karakteristik Administrative Penal Law Bidang Perpajakan’, Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2.1 (2024), 203–40 https://doi.org/10.55292/Y090B678
Ramdania, Dini, ‘Eksistensi Undang-Undang Drt Nomor 7/1955 Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Bidang Ekonomi (Economic Crimes)’, Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20.1 (2021), 1–14 https://doi.org/10.32816/PARAMARTA.V20I1.95
Rifai, Eddy, ‘Perspektif Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, 26.1 (2014), 87–101 https://doi.org/10.22146/JMH.16056
Ritonga, Binsar Zaroha, and Eko Soponyono, ‘Pembentukan Lembaga Pelaksana Pidana Sebagai Wujud Sistem Peradilan Pidana Integral’, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5.1 (2023), 136–53 https://doi.org/10.14710/JPHI.V5I1.136-153
Rizana, Rizana, ‘Reformasi Kejaksaan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2021’, Jotika Research in Business Law, 4.2 (2025), 52–56 https://doi.org/10.56445/JRBL.V4I2.232
Roach, Kent, ‘Four Models of the Criminal Process’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89.2 (1999), 671 https://doi.org/10.2307/1144140
Rodliyah, Rodliyah, Any Suryani, and Lalu Husni, ‘Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corporate Crime) Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia’, Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 5.1 (2021), 191–206 https://doi.org/10.29303/JKH.V5I1.43
Safitri, Eka Ayu, Ratih Damayanti, and Tri Sulistiyono, ‘Batasan Dan Mekanisme Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Perpajakan Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Asas Ultimum Remedium’, Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 4.3 (2025), 144–58 https://doi.org/10.35586/JHS.V4I3.11160
Seldal, M. M.Naeser, and Ellen K. Nyhus, ‘Financial Vulnerability, Financial Literacy, and the Use of Digital Payment Technologies’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 45.2 (2022), 281–306 https://doi.org/10.1007/S10603-022-09512-9
Septianingrum, Gita Ayu Ajeng, Putri Nabila, and Siti Nurhayati, ‘Teknologi Dan Kepatuhan Hukum (Tantangan Dan Strategi Dalam Sosiologi Hukum)’, Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya, 4.1 (2024), 47–62 https://doi.org/10.33830/HUMAYA.V4I1.8156
Setiawan, Eko, and Ifrani Ifrani, ‘Putusan Pemidanaan Sebagai Pengganti Denda Yang Tidak Dibayar Oleh Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup’, Badamai Law Journal, 4.1 (2019), 49–68 https://doi.org/10.32801/DAMAI.V4I1.8287
Setiawan, Irgi, Ariq Muzaffar Wahyu, Alip Rahman, and Anom Sutrisno, ‘Juridical Study of Customary Law In The Indonesian National Legal System’, Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2.8 (2024), 1824–31 https://doi.org/10.59888/AJOSH.V2I8.317
Sianturi, Ronal Hasudungan, Ahmad Feri Tanjung, and Rony Andre Christian Naldo, ‘Kepastian Hukum Implementasi Peace fine Untuk Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Legal Certainty in the Implementation of Peaceful Fines for Corruption Crime Cases’, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 12.1 (2025), 41–47 https://doi.org/10.31289/JIPH.V12I1.14093
Siburian, Riskyanti Juniver, and Denny Wijaya, ‘Korupsi Dan Birokrasi: Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Yang Lebih Berdayaguna’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3.1 (2022), 1–16 https://doi.org/10.18196/JPHK.V3I1.12233
Sipayung, Baren, Henny Saida Flora, Rosmini Rosmini, Suyanto Suyanto, and Subandi Subandi, ‘Peace fine Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Perspektif KUHP Baru Dan Perkembangan Internasional’, JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8.2 (2025), 2014–21 https://doi.org/10.54371/JIIP.V8I2.7014
Siringoringo, Ruhut, and Herlina Manullang, ‘Penerapan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Ringan Pada Tingkat Kejaksaan’, JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 7.1 (2025), 71–78 https://doi.org/10.46930/JURNALRECTUM.V7I1.5329
Sitompul, Rina Melati, and Juniarti Canceria Pasaribu, ‘The Position of the Principle of Legality vs the Principle of Opportunity in the Accemination of the Prosecutor’s Demands in the Replic Agenda (Valencya Case Study at the Karawang State Attorney)’, Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 3.01 (2024), 79–85 https://doi.org/10.32734/MAH.V3I01.15454
Sudrajat, Sudrajat, and Hudi Yusuf, ‘Sistem Peradilan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Rekonstruksi Mekanisme Penegakan Hukum Dalam Menangani Kejahatan Ekonomi Terorisme Finansial Dan Korporasi Di Era Globalisasi’, Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2.1 (2025), 312–19 https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/2180
Suleman, Nenden Herawati, ‘Perbandingan Pertanggungan Jawab Dalam Tindak Pidana Indonesia Dan Jerman’, Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 10.2 (2012), 240299 https://doi.org/10.30984/AS.V10I2.262
Sumadi, Hendy, ‘Kendala Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Penipuan Transaksi Elektronik Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 33.2 (2015), 175–203 https://doi.org/10.25072/JWY.V33I2.102
Syuhada, Muhammad, ‘Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Administratif Dan Pendekatan Restoratif Pada Kasus Pt. Bank Lippo. Tbk’, Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 2.6 (2023), 505–17 https://doi.org/10.58344/JII.V2I6.2864
Tulus, Richard, Eko Soponyono, and Laila Mulasari, ‘Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi (Studi Kasus Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penimbunan Pangan)’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 5.2 (2016), 1–18 https://doi.org/10.14710/DLJ.2016.10753
Wibowo, Muhammad Kurniawan Budi, Zaenal Mustofa, Aris Sunindyo, Agus Marzuki, and Aditya Fajri Kurnia Pradana, ‘The Oportunitas Principle in Corruption Law Enforcement: A Juridical Study on the Authority of Prosecutors’, Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 24.1 (2025), 4974–88 https://doi.org/10.31941/PJ.V24I2.6410
Wikan, Safitri, ‘Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berbasis Sustainable Ecological Development Dengan Plea Bargaining Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perusakan Lahan Tambang Di Kalimantan Selatan’, DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6.1 (2021), 49–64 https://doi.org/10.30596/DLL.V6I1.4659
Yoserwan Hamzah, ‘Penerapan Fungsi Sekunder Hukum Pidana Oleh Aparatur Penegak Hukum Dalam Hukum Pidana Ekonomi’, Nagari Law Review, 1.1 (2017) https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.1.i.1.p.16-24.2017
Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Aliran Listrik di Kota Makassar, Tinjauan, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Aliran Listrik Di Kota Makassar’, Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 5.3 (2025), 373–78 https://doi.org/10.51577/IJIPUBLICATION.V5I3.802
Zedner, Lucia, ‘Penal Subversions: When Is a Punishment Not Punishment, Who Decides and on What Grounds?’, Theoretical Criminology, 20.1 (2016), 3–20 https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615598830;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:TCRA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION