Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability

Authors

  • Redi Res Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.6

Abstract

Parate executive is the primary purpose of establishing Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights to provide solid legal protection for creditors holding mortgage objects. The easy and inexpensive execution process should make the parate executive the leading choice for creditors in auctioning mortgage objects if the debtor defaults. However, in reality, the parate execution could not be carried out properly because of the Supreme Court Decision No. 3210 K/Pdt/1984, in which one of the ratio decidendi in it that the public auction conducted by the Bandung KPKNL is invalid, and this is also supported by book II of the Supreme Court's guidelines which requires fiat execution from the District Court. This paper will explain how the two conflicting legal bases will impact the implementation of parate executives in the field.

 

Keywords: Parate Executie;  Mortgage; Land.

References

Adrian Sutedi, Hukum Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010

Buku Pedoman Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia

Herowati Poesoko, Dinamika Hukum Parate Executie Obyek Hak Tanggungan, Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2013

Pamplet Pengumuman Berita Lelang yang dikeluarkan oleh KPKNL Yogyakarta

Kartini Muljadi & Gunawan widjaja, Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2006

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan, Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan, Yogyakarta: Liberty Offset Yogyakarta, 2011

Undang-undang No 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan beserta Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah

Downloads

Published

2021-03-30

Citation Check